Skip to main content
Principles of InfluenceProtect YourselfUncategorized

Knowing the Difference Between Influence and Manipulation

By September 16, 2013August 23rd, 2025No Comments

 

On June 27th, two thieves dressed as Mormon missionaries robbed Terence Delucia’s Las Vegas residence after chatting about religion with the homeowner at his door.  Robert Estall and Abraham Austin wore black pants, white shirts with white ties, and black backpacks as disguises. Delucia let his guard down with the impostors and they forced their way into his home, beating and robbing him while his family hid in closets throughout the house.

In this instance, the thieves went beyond influence as they manipulated Delucia with their approach and attire to put him at ease. Dressing and behaving as missionaries enabled them to get close and stay close to Delucia while he talked with them before they forced their way into his house and took control of his environment. Once inside, Delucia had no choice but to cave under the thieves’ intimidation as he feared for his life and his family’s well-being. He did not want to comply, but he felt he had no choice.

Manipulation at Play

Heavy intimidation and gaining control of a target’s environment are powerful tactics, but they very clearly cross the line that separates influence from manipulation. As professional social engineers, we want to influence our targets in a manner that leaves them feeling good about having complied with our wishes. Manipulation often lacks this finesse. If a manipulator gets what he wants, then he has succeeded, regardless of the well-being of the target.

This is an important distinction to make as one navigates the world of social engineering and explores the tools used to accomplish objectives. Influence and manipulation are clearly related as they both can contain elements of subterfuge and dishonesty, but the difference lies in the intention of the engineer. Influence respects the target’s well-being and health. Manipulation is not often hindered by these concerns.

The formation of a core philosophy where there’s a differentiation between manipulation and influence is crucial to the legitimacy of the white hat social engineer. We have goals and objectives to accomplish, but not at the expense of stepping over those lines that make us brute manipulators. Be creative and be original but stay on the right side of the line.

Leave a Reply

Security Assessment Case Study
Learn more about the importance of a Social Engineering Risk Assessment.
Security Assessment Case Study
Learn more about the importance of a Social Engineering Risk Assessment.
What Makes Us Different
At Social-Engineer, we pride ourselves on what we do and how we do it. We are a security services provider, focusing on four primary attack vectors. This case study will go through how we can protect your company and what makes us different.
What Makes Us Different
At Social-Engineer, we pride ourselves on what we do and how we do it. We are a security services provider, focusing on four primary attack vectors. This case study will go through how we can protect your company and what makes us different.
Woman vs Machine
Technology is providing new, more innovative ways to enhance our world. Scientists are constantly developing smarter, faster and more intelligent machines, systems and robots. There is no doubt that each of these has evolved beyond their clockwork origins.
Woman vs Machine
Technology is providing new, more innovative ways to enhance our world. Scientists are constantly developing smarter, faster and more intelligent machines, systems and robots. There is no doubt that each of these has evolved beyond their clockwork origins.
Vishing and Phishing Must Be Ongoing to Be Effective
Most companies have a security awareness program in one form or another. If they don’t, it should be on the short list of programs to start as soon as possible. In our experience, many of these programs take the form of computer-based training.
Vishing and Phishing Must Be Ongoing to Be Effective
Most companies have a security awareness program in one form or another. If they don’t, it should be on the short list of programs to start as soon as possible. In our experience, many of these programs take the form of computer-based training.
A Case Study in Vishing
Vishing (voice-based phishing) has been a problem for quite a long time. There are many vendors in the marketplace that offer vishing services. However they tend to use robo-callers or call centers for large volume engagements. If they are using trained humans to make calls, it is likely in very low numbers.
A Case Study in Vishing
Vishing (voice-based phishing) has been a problem for quite a long time. There are many vendors in the marketplace that offer vishing services. However they tend to use robo-callers or call centers for large volume engagements. If they are using trained humans to make calls, it is likely in very low numbers.
Benefits of a Social-Engineering Risk Assessment Engagement
Your company is important. Indeed, the data you hold for your clients or employees is very valuable and attackers seek to capitalize on that data any way they can. This is where a Social Engineering Risk Assessment (SERA) engagement can help uncover possible vulnerability to attackers.
Benefits of a Social-Engineering Risk Assessment Engagement
Your company is important. Indeed, the data you hold for your clients or employees is very valuable and attackers seek to capitalize on that data any way they can. This is where a Social Engineering Risk Assessment (SERA) engagement can help uncover possible vulnerability to attackers.
The Business Value of the Social-Engineer Phishing Service
Cybercriminals are targeting the human element of organizations. Additionally, they are developing techniques to use an organization’s employees as the first point of entry. According to the 2021 Verizon DBIR report, of the 3,841 security breaches reported using social engineering, phishing was the key vector for over 80% of them.
The Business Value of the Social-Engineer Phishing Service
Cybercriminals are targeting the human element of organizations. Additionally, they are developing techniques to use an organization’s employees as the first point of entry. According to the 2021 Verizon DBIR report, of the 3,841 security breaches reported using social engineering, phishing was the key vector for over 80% of them.